|
||||||
|
I believe it was early 2010, when I started developing a genuine interest in what Steve Jobs had to say. I don’t know the exact reasoning why. But I found myself searching and perusing everything that Steve had to say. Almost everything that Steve would say made rational sense. I realized that this guy was using clear, simple language to define concepts, that if applied properly would create powerful constructs. One could clearly tell that Steve knew exactly what he was talking about, he knew very well what he wanted and he knew exactly how he wanted to get there. Mind blogging depth of perception, combined with a sense of intuition that was perhaps, unparalleled. Steve was shrewd, he calculated and weighed in on every single word he uttered in public, he was precise, to the point. He did not believe in waste, and you can tell that from his speech to the products he helped envision and bring to the market. So much has been said and written about this man. People who have directly worked with this man, have characterized him as being brilliant, a visionary, an enigma to being a dictator, a jerk, utterly ruthless.The list goes on and on on both sides of the spectrum. Yet, almost everyone unanimously agrees that Steve was and will be one of a kind. It’s not everyday that the world produces a Leader like Steve. If you ask Steve himself, he’d simply characterize himself to being a dreamer or more precisely, an artist. I am still going through the biography and I am getting to learn more about this man. Mostly it’s a feeling of awe. But there are pockets where you really begin to wonder what was really going on in his brain. It’s almost as if this was a human being who was in search of something. And he wanted to express what he was searching for. And how he chose to do it was to help make great products. He was not in it for the money. Looking at his simple attire, it doesn’t look like he was in it for the glory or the fame. But going back to his childhood, specifically the abandonment by his biological parents. I almost don’t want to make this correlation at this point, but maybe it had something to do with that? Maybe all he had been looking for all this time was love, true happiness and acceptance. Although he did clarify from time to time that he wanted nothing to do with his biological parents at the very least. Fate can be cruel and twisted, but very few have the ability to take a negative experience and turn it into something positive. I think that is what he was really trying to do all this time and the so called “weirdness” he exhibited were symptoms. Things seem to have gotten much better during the later part of his life. But I think he still set the bar up quite high for almost everyone he worked with and off course himself. Well I figured I would start with a little bit of an introduction. I am still learning about this man. He truly was an enigma. But at the same time Steve was a guiding light for the rest of us. And as Jeff Bezos would say, Steve was a great teacher to anyone who was willing to listen. Enough has been written about Steve, so it’s redundant for me to pen an entire narrative about him. But going back to where I started, and that would be the title of this blog-post , here are two observations that I have picked up after watching, reading up on Steve Jobs. These principles are powerful and they will continue being relevant for a long time:
There are tons of other observations that I might have made after watching/reading up on Jobs. But the two observations mentioned above are more important considering what is going on in the world today. Concepts such as freedom and liberty are slowly becoming archaic. So staying true to the Jobsinian way of doing things, I want to keep it simple, with a wish and a conviction that our children will be able to enjoy the same saner surroundings that we did. That our generation will not live a life of lie. We will not slide into a mindless totalitarian reality. But rather, we will understand and fix the underlying design that drives our reality. With an eventual desire of continuing to think free thoughts. Continuing to innovate and so that many more Steve Jobs could flourish. May you rest in peace, Steven Paul Jobs. You truly have been a great teacher. “… Leading a closely watched, high-growth company can be frenetic. One of the biggest problems: finding the time to be pro-active rather than reactive. But Bezos, at the end of each quarter, solves this by just going away. His solo retreats have been put to good effect, resulting in several new ideas and products, including Amazon’s fulfillment center for third-party sellers. As he has explained it, “I just lock myself up. There are no distractions from the office. No phones ringing. It’s just because with a little bit of isolation I find I start to get more creative. I do spend a lot of time web surfing during those two or three days and just looking at what hobbyists and hackers are doing. What are the sorts of things that are on the cutting edge?” Bezos, 48, will then write up two- or three-page memos, sometimes to himself, other times to his executive team. “What I find is, by the time that process is done, I’m never really sure if I invented something or not, because it starts here and ends up there. That’s what you want if you have a bunch of smart people. Somebody says, `Well, that will never work because you forgot x, y, and z.’ And then you step back and recognize that’s true and then it morphs and builds.”…” Source (Great article btw, if you are interested in all things Technology, Innovation and Business) So it took me little over a minute to create a Hexagon. Obviously I had to rely on tools such as a compass and a ruler to create a symmetrically balanced Hexagon. But even then, to do this quickly and easily, I had to draw a circle and use a hack to quickly come up with the hexagon. Now you probably know this already, but the way a honeybee creates it’s comb, is to basically architect a series of symmetrically aligned Hexagons, stacked alongside each other. There isn’t a quick and easy way for us humans to do this, even with the basic tools I mentioned above. I am sure there is a way of doing this (electronically) on Mathematica or maybe even gnuplot. It’s really a marvel of nature. How do these tiny creatures create such symmetrically balanced geometric structures with no tools at all? “Sustained innovation is no longer just about who has the most gifted scientists or the best equipped labs. It’s about who has the most compelling architecture of participation.” http://opensource.com/government/12/3/we-live-open-source-world?sc_cid=70160000000UDqHAAW I cannot help but draw comparisons. Cultural, socio-economic factors, civil liberties or lack there of, rights of women and children, innovation, rationality, state of consciousness/awareness and dealing with reality, how compassionate a society really is. The list, for me, literally goes on and on. The constant evaluation and analysis itself, has to do with living and growing up in different countries. Now, I have been into reading for as far back as I can remember. Be it reading story books in Urdu from a very early age, to be able to eventually understand and grasp the language in school. To moving to Marvel comics. Let’s admit…a little bit of Archie comics too…actually a lot of Archie comics. Then, I was one of those kids who enjoyed perusing through text books. I’d love going through the details, to be able to absorb the content. I’d read stuff for the sake of understanding and never to be able to score all A’s. That wasn’t me. I’d make sure that what I read, I understood. Otherwise, what was the point of reading? Quantity never appealed to me in this respect. I soon found myself graduating into the sphere of fiction. In the 90′s we read everything from John Grisham to Robert Ludlum and everything in between. Also borrowing heavily from the private libraries of friends and families. I read titles, that I cannot even recall right now. From zombie titles, to sci-fi from the 60 (Golden Age of sci-fi. and I still read sci-fi titles from the 60′s). Maybe this is the reason why my head is full of so much jargon information. Anyhow, specific to the blog-post and coming back to private libraries. Places like Pakistan and parts of the Middle East don’t really have a lot of libraries. The public libraries that they do have, literally look like the the storage area for a really old museum. These libraries are filled with manuscripts and material from the 1800′s to the 50′s. They wouldn’t even have that if it wasn’t for the British rule. If you are lucky, you might find a copy of the daily English newspaper. All the other newspapers are tabloids. In the 90′s, there were only be 6 or 7 such libraries for a city with 10 million inhabitants! Worst of all, you cannot even borrow a book and take it home with you. Conditions such as these, are prevalent for 95% of the population. There is no middle class. If you happen to be in the top 5%, then sure enough, you could afford subscriptions to any magazines, periodicals or the entire collection of the Encyclopedia Brittanica. Brittanica made a killing in Pakistan in the 90′s (pre Encarta time frame). Also, if you were in the top 5%, you could afford sending your kid to a school that would be on par with any other educational institute in the world. And yes, the libraries in these schools were well maintained. But it begets the question, how can a society, any society even think about advancement, when it does nothing to promote knowledge? Libraries are one of the pillars upon which you build a civilization. A society without libraries is a society steeped in darkness. A mindless slide into the abyss and eventually into irrelevance really. A lack of such a simple yet fundamental institution can and does explain the myriad of problems that these societies face. I happened to be at a library on the very second day I came to Canada. I just loved it. I somewhat knew what to expect based on what my friends and family had told me before my arrival. But to actually see the books, and best of all to be able to borrow them was awesome. I know it sounds ridiculous. It even sounds weird to me after all this time in Canada. But an experience is an experience. Once I got a job and the money started coming in, I graduated to Chapters/Indigo pretty quickly. A gentleman has got to build his collection. I bought tons of books. My friends used to joke that I buy all these different books and I don’t get to read them all. Which was partly true, but I do go through most of them eventually. But I never lost the connection to the local library. I’d still end up at the local library any given month. I’d get the titles I need. At this time in my life I do not have the luxury of taking my time to go through all the content. So I employ speed reading habits where I possibly can. But once you have gone through so many titles, you kind of know which one of the titles deserve your utmost attention (slow reading) as opposed to the others. I hear some people saying that a shift is occurring. That the consumer reading habits are moving towards different mediums and books are losing their appeal as a consequence. I personally have 2 tablets and a kindle. I use all of them. In addition to that, I go through tons of open education sources available on the web. But! I still borrow tons of stuff from the library. And I could never see myself living in a city/locale that does not go above and beyond when it comes to supporting it’s Library network. And every single time I go to the library, doesn’t matter which city/locale in Ontario, it is jam packed. Last summer, one of the councilors in Toronto, Doug Ford went on a proposed cost cutting aventure. Doug is Rob Ford’s brother, who is currently the big mayor of Toronto. Unfortunately the Ford administration also wanted to put the Toronto Library Network on the (proposed) chopping board. They wanted to shut down a significant number of libraries under the Toronto Public Library network (there are 99 branches in total as of today). Since then there has been a huge outcry from the Library workers themselves. The editorials in all the major Canadian newspapers have cautioned against such a move. This move by the Ford administration even managed to catch the ire of Margaret Atwood, one of Canada’s renowned novelist. Someone had to stand up to these guys. Just today I came across the following news article. India to link 9000 libraries: PM Manmohan. The plan is to upgrade and modernize 9000 (yes NINE THOUSAND) libraries all across India. The intent is to link all the libraries to each other and digitize as much content as possible. And to quote from the article “A young reader sitting in his village public library should be able to access books and information from across the world,” And they want to do this for every State, City, Local municipality in India. Think about this and the 35$ tablet that has been developed in India. Information of all sorts will be widely available for potentially each one of the inhabitants in India. I am blown away! What an amazing move by the Indian Government. This is an investment that will benefit India in so many different ways, that it’s hard to even quantify the positive impact this would have. In fact, Malaysia did something similar back in the 90′s and I am sure developing a culture of knowledge and sharing information has a lot to do with their success. Living in the information age, these kind of moves are a no-brainer really. Just connecting the dots, seeing what the politicians in Canada are doing and what the politicians in some of the developing countries are doing. I cannot help but wonder if we are going into a regressive state of sort. I understand these are hard times and some kind of an austerity measure has to kick in to balance the budget. But for the life of me, I cannot understand why key areas such as knowledge, education and/or health care have to be on the chopping board. When we should be spending money to modernize these institutions and services for the future. India just did, what are you gonna do Rob Ford? I spent a little bit of time reading up on and researching for my previous blog post. Reading up on a wikipedia article for the Biosphere2, I came across something, that if it’s true, is quite disturbing: <snip>Biosphere 2 suffered from CO2 levels that “fluctuated wildly” and most of the vertebrate species and all of the pollinating insects died.[19] Insect pests, like cockroaches, boomed. In practice, ants, a companion to one of the tree species (Cecropia) in the Rain Forest, had been introduced. By 1993 the tramp ant species Paratrechina longicornis, local to the area had been unintentionally sealed in and had come to dominate.[citation needed] Galagos reproduced in Biosphere 2, but a number of pollinating insects were lost to ant predation and several bird species were lost. However, many of the pollinating duties were performed by those ants and cockroaches. </snip> The excerpt from the article at wikipedia seems a bit misleading. I did a little bit more investi-ma-gation and it appears that the various issues experienced weren’t exactly all related to each other. link I have always suspected that the darker sections on the moon can only be attributed to that side getting a) singed as an aftermath of an asteroidal impact or b) Some sort of a geological activity happening under the surface that we haven’t truly understood completely or c) an epic battle between two very ancient but technologically superior species, that ended up wiping each other away. Now a and b can very well be a rational possibility. c for now is the stuff of science fiction, the kind I like to conjure up for all these short stories that I want to write but they are stuck in my brain, primarily due to laziness and well generally ….lack of time. (psst…it’s laziness..) But hey, I just saw this clip on Youtube posted by none other then NASA themselves. Basically it’s 4.4+ Billion years of the evolutionary history of the moon showcased in <3 minutes. From 0:32 and till 1:42 they show all these huge asteroids impacting the surface of the satellite. And this actually ended up confirming my long held suspicion that the dark side was in fact the result of huge asteroidal impact (a). I mean considering all of this can actually be considered as true. I haven’t really done a whole lot of research on this topic. For now I will take NASA’s word (or illustrated multi media) as true. You can watch the clip here (below). Blog post continued below (mining the moon!)–> So I am thinking. Asteroids=Minerals. Potentially minerals that we haven’t even discovered or the ones that don’t even exist on earth. And until we examine and study the chemical makeup of these elements (minerals), we wouldn’t even know the different ways we could use them. Now, mining on earth isn’t really that easy, considering 3/4 of the earth is covered with water. And the land mass that we do have is covered with vegetation, layers of sand, rock and other sediment, urban sprawl e.t.c. You factor the loss of habitat and the massive impact on the environment (fracking/general mining) and you really start beginning to weigh the pros and cons. Mining for rare earth elements (REE – Minerals really) is also an ever increasing concern. It appears REE’s though has more to do with production and politics, as opposed to general availability itself. [Source link]. So, why isn’t there a revival for lunar exploration, only that this time around it would be for commercial purposes. But first, why mining? Well to state the obvious, I am stuck on mining as it would allow the mission to go beyond being financially self sustainable. Unlike space tourism, where you will be barely breaking even. Mining itself could offer much enviable ROI, specially if we hit the kind of deposits we are targeting and quickly at that. Also, for once exploration and eventually colonizing space can stop being a drag on the tax payer. Again, who knows what we will discover once we dig in. Maybe we will find vast reserves of the elements that we deem valuable? REE’s. Massive reserve of iron core necessary for construction. And again, the yet to be discovered elements. How are we going to do this? Yeah! well I am thinking:
Adeel’s quick and dirty (pun intended) plan for mining the moon:
To recap, we cannot afford to rely on the framework of our local (national) and/or Global governance structures when it comes to the exploration and eventually the colonization of space. The private sector has (increasingly) taken an interest when it comes to this new frontier and hopefully it will continue doing so. However, as a next step we need a catalyst to be able to take colonization to the next level. The eventual success of any mission out in space relies on two factors 1) The cost benefit doesn’t just need to break even, it has to bring in substantial amount of profits so that future missions can be planned 2) The more sustainable we can make these mission the better. Sending stuff out in space takes a tremendous amount of time, “energy” (of all kinds) and resources. Besides sending tons of crap out there is neither good for the lunar surface or for the earth and for a myriad number of reasons. link I know it’s a crazy idea. But it makes rational sense, as long as it’s achievable and profitable without causing any kind of environment degradation on any surface. Mine the moon! P.s: I am listening to REM now
Reference: [1]: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/04/biospheresci/ Apart from Technology and Social Media, I am going to experiment and start blogging a little bit about politricks. Focusing primarily on the politricks that are being conducted on a Geo-political scale. I can distinguish right from left, so this shouldn’t be too hard. In fact, looking at the past couple of blog-post I made, I think I already started doing that. |
||||||
|
Copyright © 2012 adeelkhan.ca - All Rights Reserved Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
||||||