May 2012
M T W T F S S
« Apr    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Categories

NASA IOTD

Composite of a Series of Images Taken From Space Aboard the Station

 
This is a composite of a series of images photographed from a mounted camera on the Earth-orbiting International Space Station, from approximately 240 miles above Earth. Space station hardware in the foreground includes the Mini-Research Module (MRM1, center) and a Russian Progress vehicle docked to the Pirs Docking Compartment (right). Expedition 31 Flight Engineer Don Pettit said of the photographic techniques used to achieve the images: "My star trail images are made by taking a time exposure of about 10 to 15 minutes. However, with modern digital cameras, 30 seconds is about the longest exposure possible, due to electronic detector noise effectively snowing out the image. To achieve the longer exposures I do what many amateur astronomers do. I take multiple 30-second exposures, then 'stack' them using imaging software, thus producing the longer exposure." A total of 47 images photographed by the astronaut-monitored stationary camera were combined to create this composite. Image Credit: NASA
Read More

Empower, Purpose, Association

Steve Jobs – Design and Democracy

I believe it was early 2010, when I started developing a genuine interest in what Steve Jobs had to say. I don’t know the exact reasoning why. But I found myself searching and perusing everything that Steve had to say. Almost everything that Steve would say made rational sense. I realized that this guy was using clear, simple language to define concepts, that if applied properly would create powerful constructs. One could clearly tell that Steve knew exactly what he was talking about, he knew very well what he wanted and he knew exactly how he wanted to get there. Mind blogging depth of perception, combined with a sense of intuition that was perhaps, unparalleled. Steve was shrewd, he calculated and weighed in on every single word he uttered in public, he was precise, to the point. He did not believe in waste, and you can tell that from his speech to the products he helped envision and bring to the market.

So much has been said and written about this man. People who have directly worked with this man, have characterized him as being brilliant, a visionary, an enigma to being a dictator, a jerk, utterly ruthless.The list goes on and on on both sides of the spectrum. Yet, almost everyone unanimously agrees that Steve was and will be one of a kind. It’s not everyday that the world produces a Leader like Steve. If you ask Steve himself, he’d simply characterize himself to being a dreamer or more precisely, an artist.

I am still going through the biography and I am getting to learn more about this man. Mostly it’s a feeling of awe. But there are pockets where you really begin to wonder what was really going on in his brain. It’s almost as if this was a human being who was in search of something. And he wanted to express what he was searching for. And how he chose to do it was to help make great products. He was not in it for the money. Looking at his simple attire, it doesn’t look like he was in it for the glory or the fame. But going back to his childhood, specifically the abandonment by his biological parents. I almost don’t want to make this correlation at this point, but maybe it had something to do with that? Maybe all he had been looking for all this time was love, true happiness and acceptance. Although he did clarify from time to time that he wanted nothing to do with his biological parents at the very least. Fate can be cruel and twisted, but very few  have the ability to take a negative experience and turn it into something positive. I think that is what he was really trying to do all this time and the so called “weirdness” he exhibited were symptoms. Things seem to have gotten much better during the later part of his life. But I think he still set the bar up quite high for almost everyone he worked with and off course himself.

Well I figured I would start with a little bit of an introduction. I am still learning about this man. He truly was an enigma. But at the same time Steve was a guiding light for the rest of us. And as Jeff Bezos would say, Steve was a great teacher to anyone who was willing to listen.

Enough has been written about Steve, so it’s redundant for me to pen an entire narrative about him. But going back to where I started, and that would be the title of this blog-post , here are two observations that I have picked up after watching, reading up on Steve Jobs. These principles are powerful and they will continue being relevant for a long time:

  1. Design: First and foremost on the list would be the concept of design. Now Jobs was an artist and the products he helped design were a testament to that fact. Taking calligraphy would’ve obviously helped a little, as it really is the small things that add up and make a big impact. But if you listen to what Jobs had to say, his core definition of design was “how things work” and not necessarily how they look. It’s as if the Dieter Ram’s principles were invisibly etched in every product that Apple had ever manufactured. It’s a very simple concept, but applied with a little bit of thought this can prove to be very very powerful stuff. Good design is almost like a process. A process itself can be categorized as a technology. Dieter Ram’s would say, that the element of design is apparent in everything and not just products. Rams goes to state that the element of design is apparent in our systems. The very systems we have created to define our reality as it makes sense to us. So think about that for a second and imagine how you can apply that concept. Jobs understood this and he understood this well.
  2. Democracy: Based on what I have read, there is a very strict command and control structure in place at 1 infinite loop. There is a culture of secrecy, of employing psychologists, of spreading rumors to see how and which circles they travel in. I think you get the point. It’s so Orwellian, isn’t it? If true, this is ironic, because Apple has turned into the very company that it tried to cast in a certain light in it’s early days. That company was IBM, and sure enough I am referring to the famous advertisement link that showcased Apple as being the saviour. Of Apple saving the world from a dark, totalitarian environment. At the time, Apple denied any correlation to Big Blue, perhaps trying to play it safe and not risking litigation. But on other separate occasions Jobs was clearly seen/heard as referring to IBM as that Orwellian company (although he didn’t exactly use that choice of words).  You know, in spite of all of that, and in spite of everything that could potentially be occurring inside the firewall at Apple today. Jobs himself was a big believer in the principles of freedom and democracy. From artistic freedom for it’s employee base. The fact that Designers are sitting at the top of the caste system that Apple has created within it’s fortress, is a testament to that fact. Democracy, ok let’s talk about that. I mean there are so many different references to how passionate Jobs really was about the principles of freedom and Democracy. The rights of man, the rights of a human being. Jobs went out of his way to help out institutions that he believed were fundamental for these “concepts” to flourish. I mean this was a man who was had a plan for reinventing the Technological field. But going back to what I was referring to earlier on about the depth of his perception. Jobs knew very well that reinventing certain areas and unleashing these groundbreaking inventions would have an impact on some of the traditional business models. News, print, schools, other education systems. Jobs was cognizant of all of this and did everything in his capacity to make sure that these institutions can suffuse and grow with the coming shift. It was either genuine goodwill or  he clearly took a page out of the Godfather at that point. Where he systematically went to these industries and told them that he was doing them a favor and someday he might “call on them”. Whatever it was, it was brilliant. He went out of his way to help support and sustain editorial content. Apple started building linkages with the education industry in the US a long long time ago. (80?s). There was a master plan at play here, a web that  you couldn’t help but get entangled in. The principle of design was at play outside of the firewall. It begets the question, why care about these industries? Why care about anything outside the framework of the Enterprise? I mean who cares if the principles of freedom, democracy, good editorial content, robust education systems. I mean how many Enterprises out there really think about these kind of things. Not many. Enterprises and individuals might pick and choose, but I have personally never witnesses such depth and breadth of perception. I personally think that Jobs was cognizant of the fact that what he was building was much bigger than Apple itself. He set out with a vision and that was to build an ecosystem that could last and sustain itself. And he wanted this entire ecosystem to become more resilient. He definitely did not want one part of the ecosystem to end up cannibalizing the other. I think deep down inside Jobs knew that, he was who he is, because a certain framework was present. I think it started with him growing up in Los Altos or was it the Home Stead High in Cupertino (I forget), anyway the entire area was a hot bed of innovation and creativity. I mean for a kid to be able to just call Bill Hewitt and ask them for spare computer parts. Wow…. just wow. If the framework was not in place for Jobs to direct his curiosity in a certain direction, then he would have never gotten a chance to be passionate about technology. Which entails, that the Steve Jobs we know of today would never have existed. Gasp! Wait, but isn’t this happening all over the United States right now. Where the quality of education is deteriorating day by day, decade by decade. I don’t live in the United States, but based on everything I am reading there is a crisis of sorts brewing on all levels, from primary, secondary, post-secondary to all other levels of academia. The financial crisis has a lot to do with it as there is just not enough funding anymore. Falling standards of education will decrease the probability of the system producing yet another genius or another Jobs. That’s why education is so important. It’s the incubator for the nation and US is ignoring this falling standards. Very scary for North America if not the world. Secondly, the concepts of freedom and Democracy. I personally believe that there is a strange, intricate and perhaps yet to be defined connection between freedom of thought and innovation. I mean it isn’t just related to that alone, otherwise we would have seen a lot of innovation come out of Europe or say India (which is beginning to occur btw, in India at least). But Jobs understood that, and he worked hard to help support the institutions that are the indirect bastion of Democracy. I am a geek when it comes to this kind of stuff, I run brain experiments hypothesizing what would really occur if you took out some key elements that we take for granted. So I can go about this forever, and I probably will in another blog-post. The very freedoms we take for granted were the result of enormous struggles by hundreds if not millions before us. And for that reason alone, the freedoms that we do enjoy are sacred. The resultant of these struggles is what allows us to live our lives the way we intend to. Jobs understood that well and that is why he worked hard to protect and strengthen the ecosystem. In the absence of such a system, all logic, “rationale”, way of thinking eventually ends up following a strict path. That path in almost every instance leads to a dark place as it allows corruption and totalitarianism to flourish automatically. It also kills all forms of resistance, of defiance, of challenges. Forget good, useful, groundbreaking innovation to ever come out of this place. It’s a slippery slope and the history of man is pages full of warnings and examples. Overall, this here is my personal interpretation of what Jobs did and why he did it. I could be way of  target here, specially now that Apple will soon hit the 1 Trillion dollar evaluation.

There are tons of other observations that I might have made after watching/reading up on Jobs. But the two observations mentioned above are  more important considering what is going on in the world today. Concepts such as freedom and liberty are slowly becoming archaic.

So staying true to the Jobsinian way of doing things, I want to keep it simple, with a wish and a conviction that our children will be able to enjoy the same saner surroundings that we did. That our generation will not live a life of lie. We will not slide into a mindless totalitarian reality. But rather, we will understand and fix the underlying design that drives our reality. With an eventual desire of continuing to think  free thoughts. Continuing to innovate and so that many more Steve Jobs could flourish.

May you rest in peace, Steven Paul Jobs. You truly have been a great teacher.

Jeff Bezos innovates by walking away from it all

“…

Leading a closely watched, high-growth company can be frenetic. One of the biggest problems: finding the time to be pro-active rather than reactive. But Bezos, at the end of each quarter, solves this by just going away. His solo retreats have been put to good effect, resulting in several new ideas and products, including Amazon’s fulfillment center for third-party sellers. As he has explained it, “I just lock myself up. There are no distractions from the office. No phones ringing. It’s just because with a little bit of isolation I find I start to get more creative. I do spend a lot of time web surfing during those two or three days and just looking at what hobbyists and hackers are doing. What are the sorts of things that are on the cutting edge?”

Bezos, 48, will then write up two- or three-page memos, sometimes to himself, other times to his executive team. “What I find is, by the time that process is done, I’m never really sure if I invented something or not, because it starts here and ends up there. That’s what you want if you have a bunch of smart people. Somebody says, `Well, that will never work because you forgot xy, and z.’ And then you step back and recognize that’s true and then it morphs and builds.”…”

Source (Great article btw, if you are interested in all things Technology, Innovation and Business)

Dear Nature, why are you so cool

Source

Hexagon – Human vs Bees

So it took me little over a minute to create a Hexagon. Obviously I had to rely on tools such as a compass and a ruler to create a symmetrically balanced Hexagon. But even then, to do this quickly and easily, I had to draw a circle and use a hack to quickly come up with the hexagon.

Hexagon - All angles 120 Degrees

Now you probably know this already, but the way a honeybee creates it’s comb, is to basically architect a series of symmetrically aligned Hexagons, stacked alongside each other. There isn’t a quick and easy way for us humans to do this, even with the basic tools I mentioned above. I am sure there is a way of doing this (electronically) on Mathematica or maybe even gnuplot.

It’s really a marvel of nature. How do these tiny creatures create such symmetrically balanced geometric structures with no tools at all?

Tim O’Reilly on innovation

“Sustained innovation is no longer just about who has the most gifted scientists or the best equipped labs. It’s about who has the most compelling architecture of participation.” http://opensource.com/government/12/3/we-live-open-source-world?sc_cid=70160000000UDqHAAW

Libraries

I cannot help but draw comparisons. Cultural, socio-economic factors, civil liberties or lack there of, rights of women and children, innovation, rationality, state of consciousness/awareness and dealing with reality, how compassionate a society really is. The list, for me, literally goes on and on.  The constant evaluation and analysis itself, has to do with living and growing up in different countries.

Now, I have been into reading for as far back as I can remember. Be it reading story books in Urdu from a very early age, to be able to eventually understand and grasp the language in school. To moving to Marvel comics. Let’s admit…a little bit of Archie comics too…actually a lot of Archie comics. Then, I was one of those kids who enjoyed perusing through text books. I’d love going through the details, to be able to absorb the content. I’d read stuff for the sake of understanding and never to be able to score all A’s. That wasn’t me. I’d make sure that what I read, I understood. Otherwise, what was the point of reading? Quantity never appealed to me in this respect. I soon found myself graduating into the sphere of fiction. In the 90′s we read everything from John Grisham to Robert Ludlum and everything in between. Also borrowing heavily from the private libraries of friends and families. I read titles, that I cannot even recall right now. From zombie titles, to sci-fi from the 60 (Golden Age of sci-fi. and I still read sci-fi titles from the 60′s). Maybe this is the reason why my head is full of so much jargon information.

Anyhow, specific to the blog-post and coming back to private libraries. Places like Pakistan and parts of the Middle East don’t really have a lot of libraries. The public libraries that they do have, literally look like the the storage area for a really old museum. These libraries are filled with manuscripts and material from the 1800′s to the 50′s. They wouldn’t even have that if it wasn’t for the British rule. If you are lucky, you might find a copy of the daily English newspaper. All the other newspapers are tabloids. In the 90′s, there were only be 6 or 7 such libraries for a city with 10 million inhabitants! Worst of all, you cannot even borrow a book and take it home with you. Conditions such as these, are prevalent for 95% of the population. There is no middle class. If you happen to be in the top 5%, then sure enough, you could afford subscriptions to any magazines, periodicals or the entire collection of the Encyclopedia Brittanica. Brittanica made a killing in Pakistan in the 90′s (pre Encarta time frame). Also, if you were in the top 5%, you could afford sending your kid to a school that would be on par with any other educational institute in the world. And yes, the libraries in these schools were well maintained.

But it begets the question, how can a society, any society even think about advancement, when it does nothing to promote knowledge? Libraries are one of the pillars upon which you build a civilization. A society without libraries is a society steeped in darkness. A mindless slide into the abyss and eventually into irrelevance really. A lack of such a simple yet fundamental institution can and does explain the myriad of problems that these societies face.

I happened to be at a library on the very second day I came to Canada. I just loved it. I somewhat knew what to expect based on what my friends and family had told me before my arrival. But to actually see the books, and best of all to be able to borrow them was awesome. I know it sounds ridiculous. It even sounds weird to me after all this time in Canada. But an experience is an experience. Once I got a job and the money started coming in, I graduated to Chapters/Indigo pretty quickly. A gentleman has got to build his collection. I bought tons of books. My friends used to joke that I buy all these different books and I don’t get to read them all. Which was partly true, but I do go through most of them eventually. But I never lost the connection to the local library. I’d still end up at the local library any given month. I’d get the titles I need. At this time in my life I do not have the luxury of taking my time to go through all the content. So I employ speed reading habits where I possibly can. But once you have gone through so many titles, you kind of know which one of the titles deserve your utmost attention (slow reading) as opposed to the others.

I hear some people saying that a shift is occurring. That the consumer reading habits are moving towards different mediums and books are losing their appeal as a consequence. I personally have 2 tablets and a kindle. I use all of them. In addition to that,  I go through tons of open education sources available on the web. But! I still borrow tons of stuff from the library. And I could never see myself living in a city/locale that does not go above and beyond when it comes to supporting it’s Library network. And every single time I go to the library, doesn’t matter which city/locale in Ontario, it is jam packed.

Last summer, one of the councilors in Toronto, Doug Ford went on a proposed cost cutting aventure. Doug is Rob Ford’s brother, who is currently the big mayor of Toronto. Unfortunately the Ford administration also wanted to put the Toronto Library Network on the (proposed) chopping board. They wanted to shut down a significant number of libraries under the Toronto Public Library network (there are 99 branches in total as of today). Since then there has been a huge outcry from the Library workers themselves. The editorials in all the major Canadian newspapers have cautioned against such a move. This move by the Ford administration even managed to catch the ire of Margaret Atwood, one of Canada’s renowned novelist. Someone had to stand up to these guys.

Just today I came across the following news article. India to link 9000 libraries: PM Manmohan. The plan is to upgrade and modernize 9000 (yes NINE THOUSAND) libraries all across India. The intent is to link all the libraries to each other and digitize as much content as possible. And to quote from the article “A young reader sitting in his village public library should be able to access books and information from across the world,” And they want to do this for every State, City, Local municipality in India. Think about this and the 35$ tablet that has been developed in India. Information of all sorts will be widely available for potentially each one of the inhabitants in India. I am blown away! What an amazing move by the Indian Government. This is an investment that will benefit India in so many different ways, that it’s hard to even quantify the positive impact this would have. In fact, Malaysia did something similar back in the 90′s and I am sure developing a culture of knowledge and sharing information has a lot to do with their success. Living in the information age, these kind of moves are a no-brainer really.

Just connecting the dots, seeing what the politicians in Canada are doing and what the politicians in some of the developing countries are doing. I cannot help but wonder if we are going into a regressive state of sort. I understand these are hard times and some kind of an austerity measure has to kick in to balance the budget. But for the life of me, I cannot understand why key areas such as knowledge, education and/or health care have to be on the chopping board. When we should be spending money to modernize these institutions and services for the future. India just did, what are you gonna do Rob Ford?

Fluctuating Carbon Emissions can do that?

I spent a little bit of time reading up on and researching for my previous blog post. Reading up on a wikipedia article for the Biosphere2, I came across something, that if it’s true, is quite disturbing:

<snip>Biosphere 2 suffered from CO2 levels that “fluctuated wildly” and most of the vertebrate species and all of the pollinating insects died.[19] Insect pests, like cockroaches, boomed. In practice, ants, a companion to one of the tree species (Cecropia) in the Rain Forest, had been introduced. By 1993 the tramp ant species Paratrechina longicornis, local to the area had been unintentionally sealed in and had come to dominate.[citation needed] Galagos reproduced in Biosphere 2, but a number of pollinating insects were lost to ant predation and several bird species were lost. However, many of the pollinating duties were performed by those ants and cockroaches.

</snip>

The excerpt from the article at wikipedia seems a bit misleading. I did a little bit more investi-ma-gation and it appears that the various issues experienced weren’t exactly all related to each other. link

Mine the Moon?

I have always suspected that the darker sections on the moon can only be attributed to that side getting a) singed as an aftermath of an asteroidal impact or b) Some sort of a geological activity happening under the surface that we haven’t truly understood completely or c) an epic battle between two very ancient but technologically superior species, that ended up wiping each other away. Now a and b can very well be a rational possibility. c for now is the stuff of science fiction, the kind I like to conjure up for all these short stories that I want to write but they are stuck in my brain, primarily due to laziness and well generally ….lack of time. (psst…it’s laziness..)

But hey, I just saw this clip on Youtube posted by none other then NASA themselves. Basically it’s 4.4+ Billion years of the evolutionary history of the moon showcased in <3 minutes. From 0:32 and till 1:42 they show all these huge asteroids impacting the surface of the satellite. And this actually ended up confirming my long held suspicion that the dark side was in fact the result of huge asteroidal impact (a). I mean considering all of this can actually be considered as true. I haven’t really done a whole lot of research on this topic. For now I will take NASA’s word (or illustrated multi media) as true. You can watch the clip here (below). Blog post continued below (mining the moon!)–>

So I am thinking. Asteroids=Minerals. Potentially minerals that we haven’t even discovered or the ones that don’t even exist on earth. And until we examine and study the chemical makeup of these elements (minerals), we wouldn’t even know the different ways we could use them. Now, mining on earth isn’t really that easy, considering 3/4 of the earth is covered with water. And the land mass that we do have is covered with vegetation, layers of sand, rock and other sediment, urban sprawl e.t.c. You factor the loss of habitat and the  massive impact on the environment (fracking/general mining) and you really start beginning to weigh the pros and cons. Mining for rare earth elements (REE – Minerals really) is also an ever increasing concern. It appears REE’s though has more to do with production and politics, as opposed to general availability itself. [Source link].

So, why isn’t there a revival for lunar exploration, only that this time around it would be for commercial purposes. But first, why mining? Well to state the obvious, I am stuck on mining as it would allow the mission to go beyond being financially self sustainable. Unlike space tourism, where you will be barely breaking even. Mining itself could offer much enviable ROI, specially if we hit the kind of deposits we are targeting and quickly at that. Also, for once exploration and eventually colonizing space can stop being a drag on the tax payer. Again, who knows what we will discover once we dig in. Maybe we will find vast reserves of the elements that we deem valuable? REE’s. Massive reserve of iron core necessary for construction. And again, the yet to be discovered elements.

How are we going to do this? Yeah! well I am thinking:

  • Got to keep sending more autonomous probes in quick succession.
      • The probes need to be able to drill through the surface and reach substantial depths to be able to bring up samples that would confirm the possibility of a mineral of choice
      • Advancement in robotics and landing probes are just not there yet. A somewhat longer than normal manned lunar mission appears to be the only way for now. So I present to you:

Adeel’s quick and dirty (pun intended) plan for mining the moon:

  • This needs to be a co-ordinated global effort. Governments are too distracted with the various <financial> crises and the money to launch a mission like this just can’t be justified. This will have to be picked up by a consortium of private investors.
  • The first phase is discovery – Geology has gotten really advanced in the last decade or so. So I am sure a couple of months, year of scanning could bring in the kind of results one is looking for. The second phase is implementing operations which includes extracting the elements, somewhat refining them and shipping them back to earth The third phase involves ramping up the manpower and operations itself. Considering the moon is a desolate place devoid of the kind of elements we take for granted on earth. I propose:
    • Small nuclear power plants could initially provide the energy requirements link Eventually ship enough solar panel, to be able to generate the energy required for the small scale mining operations and the homeostasis requirements of the astro-miners.
    • Crowdsource the whole project, when it comes to finding innovative solutions to the kinds of problems we could experience on the lunar surface. You have to remember, this is going to be a somewhat longer than usual mission, so it’s not like you can come back and visit earth every 18 months.
    • Energy (hydro) would not be our initial concern, but food and water would very much be our primary concern. It’s not feasible to propel tons and tons of supplies to the colony in order to sustain operations. The missions needs to be as self-sustainable as possible. Water is the key ingredient. As long as the water can be extracted from under the surface, methods aeroponic and hydroponic can be employed to grow our food right there on the lunar surface.
        • Btw, India’s Chandrayaan probe did find traces of substantial amount of water under the lunar surface, and this news was released back in 2009. Estimates indicate that a cubic meter of lunar soil  would need to be squeezed in order to extract 1 liter of water. As long as abundant nuclear energy is available, I am thinking an automated mechanism of extracting, sifting the lunar soil coupled with hydraulics to press the soil to extract water could be used. A self-autonomous unit could continually do this and keep bringing water back to the base. The amount of time the astro-miners spend in the shower would need to be carefully watched though
    • I got distracted thinking about how the atmosphere at the facility would be maintained. Grade 8? science taught me that electrolysis can help us get hydrogen and oxygen, as that’s what the process does. It splits the atoms apart. It appear the ISS (International Space Station) still relies (primarily) on electrolysis when it comes to generating Oxygen for the facility. Apart from some of the other things, they also have concentrated reserves (Oxygen) if and when they need to use it. This here is a good article on how NASA’s apparatus really functions inside the space station. But the thing I am not convinced about is scalability, and that is whether substantial amounts of Oxygen can be generated and the levels of Carbon Dioxide can be maintained. Maintaining these levels would be crucial for a lot of different reasons. You’d want these astro-miners to be able to navigate through the colony without having to use any kind of a space suit indoors. As being in a space suit for 16 odd hours any given day, is just not good for human psychology. And yes I can see the irony in that statement, as in being at a place like the moon for a couple of years on end is. But lots of motivational factors could be used in order to drive efficiency and maintain sanity. Again, I point to the ISS as a successful experiment in that regard. Coming back to Carbion Dioxide, I keep getting stuck at this, because Carbon emission was a problem when it comes to the successive experiments that were conducted at the Biosphere facilities[1]. Anyone remember these? I’d need to research this a bit more and come back and update this.

To recap, we cannot afford to rely on the framework of our local (national) and/or Global governance structures when it comes to the exploration and eventually the colonization of space. The private sector has (increasingly) taken an interest when it comes to this new frontier and hopefully it will continue doing so. However, as a next step we need a catalyst to be able to take colonization to the next level. The eventual success of any mission out in space relies on two factors 1) The cost benefit doesn’t just need to break even, it has to bring in substantial amount of profits so that future missions can be planned 2) The more sustainable we can make these mission the better. Sending stuff out in space takes a tremendous amount of time, “energy” (of all kinds) and resources. Besides sending tons of crap out there is neither good for the lunar surface or for the earth and for a myriad number of reasons. link

I know it’s a crazy idea. But it makes rational sense, as long as it’s achievable and profitable without causing any kind of environment degradation on any surface.

Mine the moon!

P.s: I am listening to REM now

 

Reference:

[1]: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/04/biospheresci/

Politricks

Apart from Technology and Social Media, I am going to experiment and start blogging a little bit about politricks. Focusing primarily on the politricks that are being conducted on a Geo-political scale. I can distinguish right from left, so this shouldn’t be too hard. In fact, looking at the past couple of blog-post I made, I think I already started doing that.